Letter of Complaint to MHRA & GMC
The letter re-published here, was originally published via *'Medium' August 14th 2021, and a copy sent to the JCVI (https://www.gov.uk/government/groups/joint-committee-on-vaccination-and-immunisation), as evidence because JCVI was at that time, considering whether or not, to endorse the experimental Covid injections for children between age 12-15. JCVI initially decided not to endorse the jabs but a couple of resignations later, the JCVI did give their approval, even for 5-11 year olds:
JVCI Statement On Vaccination Of Children Aged 5-11 Years Old
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/jcvi-update-on-advice-for-covid-19-vaccination-of-children-aged-5-to-11/jcvi-statement-on-vaccination-of-children-aged-5-to-11-years-old
Because the risks are ongoing and more evidence exposing those risks, as associated with all the Covid protocols, is now available, the information and points shared below, remain very important and especially in light of recent statements from the WHO calling for a return to Covid mandates of lockdowns and advocating more boosters etc.
*Medium censored my Account for allegedly 'violating their rules'
https://veganicvibez.medium.com/letter-of-complaint-to-mhra-gmc-f29304cebedd
Despite repeatedly contacting Medium and explaining that this article does not violate their rules at all, but simply, shares honest data, expert opinion, and peer-reviewed studies that raise pertinent points of concern, as a matter of public interest and on behalf of public health & safety, the 'ERROR 404' remains - this type of punitive censorship in itself, is evidence not only in relation to risks against the public as occur when profit-driven corporations are granted freedom to remain unchallenged as they roll-out unregulated and/or experimental products - it's evidence that big-pharma is now at liberty to violate the post-WW2 Nuremberg Ruling and thereby, commit crimes against humanity on a global scale.
- If you share the concerns as expressed here, please feel free to send the link to this article to MHRA: info@mhra.gov.uk & GMC: gmc@gmc-uk.org and/or to your MP, GP etc.
Dear MHRA & GMC
I am writing to issue this formal letter of complaint and here give notice that a copy of this letter will be submitted for evidence in any future legal actions brought against the MHRA and or GMC, by aggrieved and injured members of the UK public. All points raised apply equally to GMC as well as, MHRA.
The MHRA may consider some or many of the points, evidence, and concerns, as raised herein, to be outside of MHRA remit, therefore, it is important to establish from the outset, that a body of authority designated the role of endorsing new medical products and treatments, either by authorisation or license, for use in the NHS, does need to be especially vigilant and to take into account, all available evidence before e.g. Authorising experimental, nano-biotech-genetic-therapy injections which, subjects UK citizens, not only to risks associated with traditional experimental vaccines but also, to risks associated with the new biotechnology and associated particles i.e. The compound, polyethylene glycol (PEG) which, is known to trigger Anaphylactic reactions and, has never before been used in a licensed vaccine:
PEG has never been used before in an approved vaccine, but it is found in many drugs that have occasionally triggered anaphylaxis — a potentially life-threatening reaction that can cause rashes, plummeting blood pressure, shortness of breath, and a fast heartbeat [and death].
Anaphylactic reactions can occur with any vaccine but are usually extremely rare — about one per 1 million doses. As of 19 December [within weeks of the ‘vaccine’ rollout], the United States had seen six cases of anaphylaxis among 272,001 people who received the COVID-19 vaccine, according to a recent presentation by Thomas Clark of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC); the United Kingdom has recorded two. Because the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines use a new platform, the reactions call for careful scrutiny, says Elizabeth Phillips, a drug hypersensitivity researcher at Vanderbilt University Medical Center who attended an NIAID meeting on 16 December. “This is new.”
The point is; the myriad of issues & concerns that needed to be addressed before rolling out a mass, public-health-experiment, are here presented and with many more links of evidence provided: Can the MHRA provide the UK public they are established to serve, with a record of which information, evidence and concerns, MHRA assessed and explored, prior to ‘authorising’ corporate-pharmaceuticals to liberally experiment on UK citizens minus any liability?
The full range or severe, adverse-events/reactions to the emergency-authorised bio-therapy-injections, will be presented here and bearing in mind that only a tiny percentage of AEs are ever reported which means, if Britain recorded two cases of anaphylaxis after receiving the Covid injection, then there were probably around 10 to 100 within the first month of ‘vaccine’ uptake.
Can the MHRA credibly refute the charge, that they have acted to perpetuate a medical, economical & political fraud that essentially, has heavily discriminated against the UK public in favour of research & financial benefits to corporate interests and told British citizens, they must lose all their freedoms, education, rights & livelihoods until, they have consented to participate in a series of worldwide, medical & psychological experiments, and have a stamp in a ‘vaccine-passport’ to prove it? And all of this to address an alleged ‘new’ virus that has a 95% survival rate even among the over-60s?
The Lancet: Likelihood of survival of coronavirus disease 2019
For people aged 60 years and older, the chance of survival following SARS-CoV-2 infection is approximately 95% in the absence of comorbid conditions.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(20)30257-7/fulltext
It is noticeable too, that while UK Gov’t and health authorities have gone to great lengths to explain how people with co-morbidities and/or underlying illnesses, are at greater risk from Covid, there has been no focus of attention on people who despite being over age 60 and/or living with existing health issues, have, on testing ‘Covid-Positive’, been asymptomatic or displayed only mild symptoms and some, even with severe symptoms, have nonetheless, recovered?
Fortune smiles on elderly as they beat COVID-19
The recovery of elderly people across the world from coronavirus has provided a thin glimmer of hope in these otherwise dark times.
1) On what grounds of medical evidence has the MHRA seen fit to ‘authorise’ experimental bio-nanotech-genetic-therapy injections when, it is a known fact that SARS-CoV2/Covid/C19 is not a medical emergency i.e. If C19 was a ‘medical emergency’ then the Imperial College conclusion as published on UK.Gov website from March 19th 2020, would not have stated that C19 is not considered a High Consequence Infectious Disease’/HCID. The Imperial College has not altered their conclusion, which remains the same to this very day:
Or else, can you explain how a medical emergency, focusing on an alleged ‘new’ coronavirus, is not an HCID?
COVID-19 is no longer considered to be a high-consequence infectious disease (HCID) in the UK.
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/high-consequence-infectious-diseases-hcid
2) The MHRA has continued to support a variety of nefarious UK Government and WHO medical dictates regardless of the fact that Lockdowns, social distancing, isolation and masks, have irrefutably inflicted far more injury and contributed to many more deaths than the non-HCID titled ‘Covid’? Or else, are we to assume that those injured or dead via Covid-Restrictions, may be casually dismissed since they can be assumed to have had underlying problems with mental health, domestic violence and personal finance?
Can the MHRA please provide some solid evidence to justify the draconian and prolonged restrictions that have directly contributed to a sharp spike in suicides, and to such a degree, that suicide has caused greater fatalities than Covid among younger age-groups?
Five Times More Children Committed Suicide Than Died Of COVID-19 During Lockdown: UK Study
Five times more children and young people committed suicide than died of COVID-19 during the first year of the pandemic in the United Kingdom, according to a study, which also concluded that lockdowns are more detrimental to children’s health than the virus itself.
The study below (published April 2020), provides an extensive review of Covid restriction impacts within the first few months of the alleged ‘pandemic’ and things have gotten exponentially worse since. To date, almost 18 months since the pandemic was announced, the world has not listed anywhere near the projected hospitalisations & death rates as witnessed during the post-war ‘Spanish’/Kansas-Flu, even with the fraudulently inflated death rates.
The socio-economic implications of the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19): A review
Lockdown and social distancing measures to prevent spread of COVID-19 have heightened fears of increasing levels of domestic violence, which includes physical, emotional and sexual abuse [109].
Refuge, one of the UK’s domestic abuse charities, has reported a 25% increase in calls made to its helpline since lockdown measures were announced [110].
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7162753/
Can the MHRA provide any evidence of consultations regarding assessing potential risks to women and children, on being forced into isolation and confinement with partners, who become violent & aggressive under stress i.e. Men suddenly prohibited from pursuing activities that help lower their stress levels i.e. Fishing, sports, spending time with friends or family?
Domestic abuse killings double and calls to helpline surge by 50% during coronavirus lockdown
Official figures from the Office for National Statistics also show a spike in domestic abuse since Covid restrictions were imposed, accounting for around one in five crimes recorded in the four months since March.
The vast majority of domestic abuse victims are under age 50 and therefore, were least at risk from Covid. On examining the various studies to date, impacts of prolonged restrictions have killed many more people than would have died from Covid without any restrictions. All such lawfully identified results amount to an unforgivable level of harm to those least at risk and to the extent, that MHRA and other so-called ‘professionals’ among UK Gov’t & Authorities, are now open to charges of criminal-negligence i.e. While the UK Government & MHRA have (negligently) granted ‘non-liability; status to vaccine producers and their administrators, this does not mean that UK Government & MHRA etc., are not liable to face prosecutions and compensation payouts to victims of other alleged “safety measures”.
3) The MHRA has supported the major fraud of systematically listing non-Covid deaths as ‘Covid’ based on such tenuous evidence that an individual had tested ‘positive’ within 60 and then later, 28, days of their death via e.g. cancer or falling off a ladder. All such fraudulently bumped-up Covid death figures are then widely broadcast to the UK public, who are thus subjected to unnecessary trauma and fear.
Many more have succumbed to more serious illnesses or have died, directly due to denying NHS treatments and operations during Lockdowns and with millions unable to visit their local GP. The rationale behind this approach was to free-up the NHS for treating the projected ‘mass’ of Covid cases. Meanwhile, anyone contacting NHS helplines or GP surgeries, citing breathing difficulties or cold & flu symptoms, was told to “stay home” and “isolate”. Britain’s hospitals stood EMPTY and the hastily erected ‘Nightingale Centre’ (at a cost of £200 million) treated just 200 Covid patients before being dismantled earlier this year (£1million per patient!). UK NHS is now facing a predicted 13 MILLION Waiting List.
Dr Malcom Kendrick: COVID deaths — how accurate are the statistics?
Was every person in a care home now to be diagnosed as dying of COVID? Well, that was certainly the advice given in several parts of the UK.
Where I work, things were left more open. I discussed things with colleagues and there was very little consensus. I put COVID on a couple of certificates, and not on a couple of others. Based on how the person seemed to die.
I do know that other doctors put down COVID on anyone who died from early March onwards. I didn’t. What can be made of the statistics created from data like these?
https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/05/31/covid-deaths-how-accurate-are-the-statistics/
Covid: 4.6m people missed out on hospital treatment in England in 2020
Exclusive: millions of ‘missing patients’ could send overall NHS waiting list soaring to nearly 10m
‘It was one big whirlwind’: artist on being denied access to cancer treatment
Could NHS waiting lists really reach 13 million?
https://ifs.org.uk/publications/15557
Sajid Javid warns NHS waiting list could soar to 13 million amid Covid third wave
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/nhs-waiting-list-covid-hospitals-b1881953.html
Surely, the MHRA ought to have insisted that funds spent on useless, temporary hospitals, masks, testing, mobile apps, advertising/propaganda campaigns, useless/dangerous ventilators, public lockdown payments and even, increased military expenditures i.e. Deploying the British army on public testing missions and establishing an online cyber army, the 77th Brigade, to monitor online Covid discussions, would be far better spent and saved many more lives through investing all those hundreds of £BILLIONS instead, into our NHS in order it could continue to provide regular treatment as well as, address Covid?
Effectively, Covid was used to justify shutting down our NHS & GP surgeries, while elderly UK citizens were receiving ‘Do Not Resuscitate Notices’ in the post!
In relation to the DNR notices, can the MHRA explain the logic behind telling children they’re a “health-risk” to Grandma & Granddad and prohibiting contact but meanwhile, NHS & Paramedics are instructed to deny the elderly life-saving treatment? And, with an NHS backlog of over 7 million after just 18 months of Covid Restrictions, how many millions will have now be dying or rendered permanently disabled, in order to ‘save’ an alleged, ‘potential 300,000’, from death-by-Covid?
4) Trauma and fear are indicative of severe stress. Surely, the MHRA are fully aware of the numerous medical & scientific studies, confirming the dire impacts that prolonged stress inflicts against human immunity and emotional & psychological health?
‘Long-term and chronic stress leads to persistently high cortisol and corticosteroid levels, which cause resistance to cortisol and impaired anti-inflammatory effects on the immune system. Such effects result in chronic infection, chronic inflammatory autoimmune diseases, or cancers as well as other physiological disorders. Chronic stress also inhibits the cross-talk of immune cells and signaling networks.’
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2019.00245/full
Lockdowns, social isolation and masks along with lack of absorption of vitamin D3 via Sunlight, all have negative impacts on immunity. UK citizens with darker skin, are placed at a much higher risk through lack of vitamin D3 due to their needed longer exposure to sunlight in order to absorb D3 which, is known to support a healthy immune response. Therefore, lockdown restrictions and half the face covered with a mask, placed dark-skinned UK citizens at an even higher risk
Masks especially are little more than Petri-Dish-rags; discarded, used masks inevitably, litter every public space and are effectively, a bio-hazard being as they are proven to be infected with a variety of dangerous pathogens i.e. Bacterial Pneumonia, Meningitis etc. People are continually touching the masks and their face and then making contact with others — as happens more so, among school children. The masks also, inhibit oxygen intake and increase CO2 levels in the blood which can cause, dizziness, confusion and even death.
A Group Of Parents Sent Their Kids’ Face Masks to A Lab for Analysis. Here’s What They Found
The analysis detected the following 11 alarmingly dangerous pathogens on the masks:
• Streptococcus pneumoniae (pneumonia)
• Mycobacterium tuberculosis (tuberculosis)
• Neisseria meningitidis (meningitis, sepsis)
• Acanthamoeba polyphaga (keratitis and granulomatous amebic encephalitis)
• Acinetobacter baumanni (pneumonia, blood stream infections, meningitis, UTIs — resistant to antibiotics)
• Escherichia coli (food poisoning)
• Borrelia burgdorferi (causes Lyme disease)
• Corynebacterium diphtheriae (diphtheria)
• Legionella pneumophila (Legionnaires’ disease)
• Staphylococcus pyogenes serotype M3 (severe infections — high morbidity rates)
• Staphylococcus aureus (meningitis, sepsis)
Half of the masks were contaminated with one or more strains of pneumonia-causing bacteria. One-third were contaminated with one or more strains of meningitis-causing bacteria. One-third were contaminated with dangerous, antibiotic-resistant bacterial pathogens. In addition, less dangerous pathogens were identified, including pathogens that can cause fever, ulcers, acne, yeast infections, strep throat, periodontal disease, Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever, and more.
Experimental Assessment of Carbon Dioxide Content in Inhaled Air With or Without Face Masks in Healthy Children
‘The youngest children had the highest values, with one 7-year-old child’s carbon dioxide level measured at 25 000 ppm.’
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2781743
There is no evidence whatsoever, to prove that masks can offer anything more than very minimal protection from a virus. In fact, there are many peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite. When one weighs up the risks posed by mandatory mask-wearing against the benefits, there is no doubt at all that the disadvantages very strongly outweigh any alleged benefits and, when worn en-masse within the public sphere, are more likely to facilitate spread not only of Covid but also, of many other pathogens.
Mask-wearing has contributed to a steep rise in gum disease and NHS-Dentist waiting lists for the vulnerable social groups who rely on them, have grown from being just a few-weeks (prior to Covid), to 2–3 years after Covid. This is terrible news for children — especially those in urgent need of braces; in space of two years, a child’s teeth can become badly malformed causing misalignment of the jaw, headaches, mouth and eating problems. Parents able to pay e.g. £100, can get a Dentist appointment for their child, within a week.
I here remind the MHRA that the NHS was established precisely, to ensure that a quality health service was assured to all UK citizens regardless of income. Such lengthy disparities in waiting times between private and NHS, is absolutely unacceptable as is, the notion that vital dental and other health treatments, can be denied during alleged attempts to suppress an allegedly ‘novel’-coronavirus — most especially, in light of the fact that it was known from the start, that people with existing, physical & mental health problems, have impaired immunity and therefore, are more susceptible to the worst impacts? Surely, the sick needed extra dental, psychological & physical healthcare, not less?
Many people entered the pandemic from positions of disadvantage. Certain population groups in our society already had a higher risk of experiencing poor mental health and wellbeing than people from more advantaged positions.
https://www.mentalhealth.org.uk/coronavirus/divergence-mental-health-experiences-during-pandemic
The USA Study as shared below is a mirror of what has happened in Britain:
The Implications of COVID-19 for Mental Health and Substance Use
During the pandemic [January-to-June 2020], about 4 in 10 adults in the U.S. have reported symptoms of anxiety or depressive disorder, a share that has been largely consistent, up from one in ten adults who reported these symptoms from January to June 2019
Again, since C19 is NOT an HCID, can you please explain to the UK public how the MHRA has justified endorsing all of the above Covid-Responses that collectively, rapidly diminish human immunity and while simultaneously, failing to promote vitamin C & D3 supplements, regular fresh-air & exercise, and advise against consumption of sugar?
‘EATING ANY KIND OF SUGAR HAS THE POTENTIAL TO REDUCE YOUR BODY’S DEFENSES BY 75% OR MORE FOR FOUR TO SIX HOURS.’
https://alternativehealthatlanta.com/sugar-and-your-immune-system/
Furthermore, the MHRA has actively denounced use of known, non-experimental treatments such as Invormectin & Hydroxychloroquine which many medical experts have used to successfully treat hundreds of hospitalised Covid cases and yet, the MHRA has refused to endorse those treatments in the NHS and thereby, has actively denied a remedy using licensed and inexpensive medical products.
5) In light of the evidence and in face of MHRA’s own financial interests and connections within corporate pharmaceutical profit-driven objectives, it is profoundly obvious that everything MHRA has endorsed for purpose of combatting infections & transmission, has been toward promoting the alleged ‘need’ for profitable, experimental vaccines, while actually increasing illness and mortality through every illness as well as via Covid i.e. The callous decision to evict elderly patients from hospital beds into nursing homes where Covid & mortality numbers promptly spiked.
Britain has since March 2020, been kept on perpetual ‘Covid-Alert’ via mass testing of the public and the resulting spikes in alleged ‘cases’. As Reuters Fact Checker explains:
‘The CDC says there is a chance that antibody testing may produce a positive result if you have antibodies from another virus from the coronavirus family, such as the common cold. Some milder coronaviruses can cause illnesses like the common cold, while others cause more severe illnesses like Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS). The COVID-19 viral test [when performed correctly] tells patients whether they have a current infection with SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19’
https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-covid-viral-antibody-test-c-idUSKBN24269Z
The Lateral Flow tests, according to US FDA, belong in the ‘TRASH’:
Stop Using Innova Medical Group SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Qualitative Test: FDA Safety Communication
‘Stop using the Innova Medical Group SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Qualitative Test.
Destroy the tests by placing them in the trash or
Return the tests to Innova using the FedEx return label that was included with the recall letter that Innova sent to customers.’
As for the PCR tests, unless they are performed at under 25 cycles, they are equally unreliable and also, cannot differentiate between a common cold & Covid. Britain has been running the PCRs at between 35–45 cycles!
The WHO Confirms that the Covid-19 PCR Test is Flawed: Estimates of “Positive Cases” are Meaningless. The Lockdown Has No Scientific Basis
The MHRA should know more than anybody that ‘asymptomatic’ does not NOT constitute a “case” and is actually, most likely indicative of natural immunity. Certainly, there is zero evidence to support the theory that asymptomatics can spread Covid — again, the scientifically confirmed evidence tells us that asymptomatics are non-infectious i.e. Can the MHRA explain WHY you have ignored the results of a joint *East-Anglia-University-Wuhan Study on 10 million people that CONFIRMS asymptomatics do not spread Covid?
‘A mass screening programme of more than 10 million Wuhan residents identified 300 asymptomatic cases, but none were infectious — according to a study involving the *University of East Anglia’
https://www.uea.ac.uk/news/-/article/wuhan-mass-screening-identifies-hundreds-of-asymptomatic-cases
*Disturbingly, East Anglia University take pains to state:
‘But the research team warn that their findings do not show that the virus can’t be passed on by asymptomatic carriers. Rather, strict non-pharmaceutical interventions such as mask-wearing, hand washing, social distancing and lockdown have helped reduce the virulence of Covid-19.’
The above statement completely negates the whole purpose of the study which, was to determine whether or not asymptomatics had spread Covid. Therefore masks, handwashing, social distancing etc, had not prevented infection because otherwise, how could the test-subjects be diagnosed ‘asymptomatic’ ? Surely, in light of the Study’s findings and for sake of reducing the severe mental health issues — as confirmed via studies on the negative impacts of social-isolation and distancing — the prognosis is most in favour of ending the ‘social distancing’ mandates for asymptomatics, as has happened in Wuhan *China? The pertinent point being: The medicine must not cause more harm than the infection.
*April 2020: Coronavirus: ‘Heroic city’ Wuhan ends lockdown with spectacular party 11 weeks after it was epicentre of crisis
Does the MHRA endorse the censorship of anyone sharing facts of evidence that are in opposition to Gov’t narratives supporting mass profits for e.g. Pfizer? Why is it necessary to silence medical scientists, top virology experts, nurses and doctors?
From Pfizer to Moderna: who’s making billions from Covid-19 vaccines?
Efforts to Silence the Debate on Vaccination Safety: The Weaponization of the CDC Against Public Health
Silencing Medics: Letter to Sir Simon Stevens
https://www.covid19assembly.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Letter-to-Sir-Simon-Stevens.pdf
Since it is very clear that mortality was vastly overestimated, why is it that nonetheless, the sequence of events have played out as planned from the start, on the premise that mortality estimates were accurate and now, to the extent that the MHRA grants emergency authorisation for the public to be cajoled and compelled into participating in a mass biotech experiment? In whose interests does the MHRA operate; Corporate Pharma and their puppet-politicians or the British Public?
Public Health Lessons Learned From Biases in Coronavirus Mortality Overestimation
*Lisa Shaw death: Husband calls for vaccine choice
*Noticeably, this prime-time TV publicity was permitted doubtless, due to the death being a BBC journalist, coupled with the righteous persistence of an angry, devastated husband & children. Nonetheless, great lengths are taken to (some would say ‘fraudulently’), reassure the public that vaccine injuries are normal but extremely rare and then flagrantly use the whole story to push the vaccines as “safe and effective”. At no point is there expressed any commitment to investigate Mrs Shaw’s death as an AE-fatality within a mass medical experiment using an experimental new biotechnology.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-tyne-57848367
Why should the UK public have any confidence in the MHRA as an objective, professional body, trusted to look out for the nation’s health, when members of the MHRA themselves, have direct connections with and/or vested interests in the very corporations and/or organisations whose products they are asked to license?
MHRA Board: declarations of interest
The main decision-making, executive and managerial bodies at the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).
MHRA awarded over £980,000 for collaboration with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the World Health Organisation
ISPE board member Dr June Raine to become interim CEO of the UK’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA)
https://www.pharmacoepi.org/ispe-updates/interim-ceo/
About ISPE
The International Society for Pharmaceutical Engineering is the world’s largest not-for-profit association serving its Members by leading scientific, technical and regulatory advancement throughout the entire pharmaceutical lifecycle.
CRUSE — BEREAVEMENT CARE — WHITEHOUSE, Michael John MHRA
https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/00638709/officers
Corporate Support (Cruse Bereavement)
We are the leading bereavement charity covering England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Bereavement will affect everyone at some point in their lives, which is why our services are available for anyone who has been bereaved no matter how or where the death occurred.
https://www.cruse.org.uk/corporate
National Audit Office (M Whitehouse)
Michael John WHITEHOUSE (Cruse B)
SUSSEX PRIMARY CARE LTD
https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11695322/officers
UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX(THE)
https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/RC000672
The University of Sussex is a leading research-intensive university near Brighton. We have both an international and local outlook, with staff and students from more than 100 countries and frequent engagement in community activities and services.
https://www.sussex.ac.uk/about/
Browse by Funders Sussex University Gates Foundation
Publication By ‘Fierce Biotech’: MHRA to move HQ to same area as EMA’s London digs
The MHRA last moved offices toward the end of 2010. That relocation moved the agency a mile or so across the River Thames from a location in Vauxhall to a site close to Victoria station. Now, the MHRA is set to move about seven miles east to a facility at Canary Wharf, the business district the EMA currently shares with many major banks.
The United Kingdom's drug regulator is moving its headquarters to within half a mile of the EMA's current home…www.fiercebiotech.com
6) The latest gov’t & media scaremongering propaganda exercises refer to “variants” and “Long Covid”.
“Long Covid” appears to be yet another medical-fraud: Post Viral Syndrome/PVS is a long-known health-impact after recovery from a variety of cold & flu viruses. PVS occurs after a heavy viral infection through which, the host’s immune-system is overwhelmed: There is no evidence to support the present ‘theory’/baseless-propaganda that asymptomatics or very mild cases cited as ‘Covid’, threaten to inflict PVS. The idea that children are commonly suffering from “Long Covid” is again, totally ridiculous when it is more likely that children are exhibiting impacts of wearing masks for several hours a day and subject to the immense stress of lockdowns, isolation and fears of catching Covid or else, losing friends and family to it.
‘Post-viral syndrome, or post-viral fatigue, refers to a sense of tiredness and weakness that lingers after a person has fought off a viral infection. It can arise even after common infections, such as the flu.’
https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/326619
In reference to variants, it is a well-known medical & scientific fact that viral variants are commonly weaker then the original virus and therefore, pose less of a risk due to being an imperfect copy — if this were not the case, humanity would have long since become extinct.- also, the human immune system, having conquered the original, is very capable in recognising similar traits among any variants. Variants are bound to occur among the various human cultures i.e. Differences in the genetics of human hosts coupled with climate, food and other pathogens impacting host immune responses — the idea that an Indian, African or Brazillian variant is more deadly to British people, is ridiculous and the MHRA must know this — otherwise, the colonisers of history would have succumbed to coronavirus-variants developed within the many indigenous populations, they conquered.
‘RNA viruses have high mutation rates — up to a million times higher than their hosts — and these high rates are correlated with enhanced virulence and evolvability, traits considered beneficial for viruses. However, their mutation rates are almost disastrously high, and a small increase in mutation rate can cause RNA viruses to go locally extinct. Researchers often assume that natural selection has optimized the mutation rate of RNA viruses, but new data shows that, in poliovirus, selection for faster replication is stronger and faster polymerases make more mistakes. The fabled mutation rates of RNA viruses appear to be partially a consequence of selection on another trait, not because such a high mutation rate is optimal in and of itself.’
https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3000003
No one appears to have any explanation as to why the original SARS-CoV did not present as many rapid mutations as the alleged SARS-CoV2 nor even, exactly how the two differ? The symptoms for SARS-CoV2 are identical to SARS-CoV:
Facts about severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)
The incubation period ranges between 3 and 10 days. A high fever then appears accompanied by general symptoms and, often, by diarrhea. Some days later, pneumonia becomes manifest, which in some cases progresses to produce fatal respiratory failure (overall death rate has been about 10%, but exceeded 50% for patients aged over 60 years).
https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/severe-acute-respiratory-syndrome/facts
Both SARS strains rely on the same S-spike protein as gain-of-function into the ACE2-Receptor. Indeed, original SARS appears to have a much higher mortality rate and yet, without any of the restrictions now on Covid, original SARS more or less fizzled out and without a vaccine either: Can MHRA explain how a less deadly variety of SARS that barely impacts children at all, with a fatality rate on a par with Flu among people over 70, and a 98% survival rate among people under 60, is branded a “pandemic” and used to justify shutting down people’s lives, livelihoods and healthcare?
How is it possible to identify a ‘new variant’ when the only samples of SARS-CoV2 are computer-generated via Metagenomic Next Generation Sequencing — a process that a medical science article published in November 2019, refers to ‘regulatory hurdles and considerations that will need to be addressed before mNGS could enter mainstream clinical diagnostic laboratories as an FDA-validated test.’ And yet. just a few months later, mNGS is relied on to identify a new virus as a basis for developing mRNA Covid injections and even, to identify variants?
Published November 2019: Metagenomic Next Generation Sequencing: How Does It Work and Is It Coming to Your Clinical Microbiology Lab?
…there are no currently FDA-cleared or approved mNGS tests that can be sent for microbial testing, although there are laboratories certified under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA ’88) which offer testing on clinical samples. To date, only a few diagnostic NGS systems have been cleared by the FDA for oncological testing or detection of cystic fibrosis, for example. A recent review describes in detail many of the regulatory hurdles and considerations that will need to be addressed before mNGS could enter mainstream clinical diagnostic laboratories as an FDA-validated test.
https://asm.org/Articles/2019/November/Metagenomic-Next-Generation-Sequencing-How-Does-It
Genomic sequencing of SARS-CoV-2: a guide to implementation for maximum impact on public health
Several different metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) approaches were used to identify the causative pathogen of COVID-19
https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240018440
7 Has the MHRA committed to considering any of the numerous studies on the issue of vaccine-related pathogenic priming as a possible source of variants?
Pandemic of the Vaccinated — Is the Covid-19 injection creating a pathway for a more dangerous variant?
https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/08/06/pandemic-of-the-vaccinated/
Vaccines Are Pushing Pathogens to Evolve
Andrew Read became a scientist so he could spend more time in nature, but he never imagined that would mean a…www.quantamagazine.org
Imperfect Vaccination Can Enhance the Transmission of Highly Virulent Pathogens
https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1002198
MIT & Harvard Study Suggests mRNA Vaccine Might Permanently Alter DNA After All
Dr. Doug Corrigan via Science With Dr. Doug "The authors sought to answer how a PCR test is able to detect segments of…www.algora.com
Never one to pass by any opportunity for more profit, Pfizer’s answer to their product’s now publicly apparent failure, is to recommend regular booster shots to combat the alleged new variants; how is it possible to be contemplating boosters, when the existing vaccines have not yet completed stage-3 of the emergency-use authorised trials? What evidence does the MHRA have to prove conclusively, that the vaccine failures are due precisely, to variants?
Pfizer, responding to criticism, presses case for COVID-19 booster shots
https://www.biopharmadive.com/news/pfizer-coronavirus-vaccine-booster-plan-delta/604063/
Essentially, what Pfizer is proposing is to forgo completion of Stage-3 and instead, create additional vaccines for variants based on the as yet, unregulated mNGS diagnostics and then, to experiment further on the public, who have already submitted to the initial experimental ‘vaccines’. Since when was this kind of trial permitted or regulated for? Where are the regulations to protect the public, surrounding these trials? Where is the evidence to prove the vaccines are “safe and effective”.
If indeed the vaccines were legally known to be “safe and effective”. the MHRA would have approved them by license rather than grant only ‘emergency-authorisation’. Certainly had the MHRA granted a license to approve the vaccines, based on incomplete trials, you would have been legally liable for any resulting damages and actually, the manufacturers and facilitators could never have been granted non-liability in Britain, without MHRA granting the emergency authorisation!
If UK Gov’t & MHRA truly are acting on behalf of public health interests, then why establish a law to protect the vaccine makers from economic injury, but no laws to protect Covid ‘vaccine’ recipients from physical injury and death?
Covid Vaccines: The Good, The Bad, The Ugly
https://swprs.org/covid-vaccines-the-good-the-bad-the-ugly/
Paralysis, Cardiac Arrest, Death — All of these are adverse reactions to the Covid-19 vaccines suffered by infants as young as two-months-old
FACT — Deaths due to the Covid Vaccines in the UK after 6 months are 407% higher than deaths due to all other Vaccines combined in the past 11 years
20,595 DEAD 1.9 Million Injured (50% SERIOUS) Reported in European Union’s Database of Adverse Drug Reactions for COVID-19 Shots | by Brian Shilhavy | HealthImpact News.com
EudraVigilance is only for countries in Europe who are part of the European Union (EU), which comprises 27 countries.
…as high as these numbers are, they do NOT reflect all of Europe. The actual number in Europe who are reported dead or injured due to COVID-19 shots would be much higher than what we are reporting here.
Government’s links with Pfizer deal-brokers under the spotlight
Public Health Act 2016 (WA) — Instrument of Authorisation — Authorisation to Supply or Administer a Poison [SARS-COV-2 (COVID-19) V– Australian Defence Force] (№2) 2021
Exclusive: Medical Board Attempts To Strip Doctor Of License Over Informed Vaccine Consent
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z5JSmSubwEw&ab_channel=BenSwann
BMJ: Covid-19 vaccines for children: hypothetical benefits to adults do not outweigh risks to children
Denmark, Norway suspend AstraZeneca vaccine over blood clot fears
Finland suspends AstraZeneca vaccine despite European regulator saying it is safe and effective
Finland has become the latest Scandinavian country to suspend the AstraZeneca vaccine - despite the European Medicines…www.euronews.com
SARS-CoV-2 RNA reverse-transcribed and integrated into the human genome
Prolonged SARS-CoV-2 RNA shedding and recurrence of PCR-positive tests have been widely reported in patients after…pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Since it is already established the Covid-19 is not an HCID and therefore, cannot constitute grounds for a ‘health emergency’, the present authorisation for mass, experimental vaccinations, is preposterous: That a British Health Authority could so casually agree to permit experimental products formulated on strength of experimental diagnostics and unreliable tests, to be administered to 60+ million people and then, when they promptly fail, it’s time to administer experimental boosters — and still, no truly informed consent, no legal protection or guarantees when recipients suffer adverse events.
According to MHRA & Gov’t narratives to date, Britain’s Yellow Card database is merely reflective of ‘coincidental’ health issues ‘as would normally afflict the population in any given time frame’. How on earth can anyone credibly conduct a phase-3 experiment based on the criteria that all adverse events/AEs are to be dismissed as ‘conicidental’ and even, when it is a known fact that the Yellow Card database reflects only a minority of AEs and, that previously, the YC-database is only for fully licensed health products and has never before been used as a mechanism for identifying AEs within a medical trial using brand new bio-nano-technology based on unregulated pathogenic diagnostics:
Yellow Card MHRA
Before a medicine is marketed, any experience of its safety and efficacy is limited to its use in clinical trials. However, the conditions under which patients and medicines are studied in clinical trials do not necessarily reflect the way the medicines are used in hospitals or general practice once they are marketed. For example, at the time of its licensing, a medicine will only have been tested in a relatively small number of patients for a limited length of time.
Despite the extensive research in animals and clinical trials in humans for a specific medicine, some Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) may not be seen until a very large number of people have received the medicine. Therefore it is vital that the safety of all medicines is monitored throughout their marketed life — this is known as pharmacovigilance.
https://yellowcard.mhra.gov.uk/monitoringsafety/
When a human test subject suffers any sign of an adverse reaction within a medical trial, that subject is closely monitored and careful analysis performed to be sure about the exact cause of that AE. When a test subject dies or develops a life-threatening illness, the trial will ordinarily be halted for further research, as happened in the case example as provided below i.e. A trial in which, one-quarter of the test subjects developed lymphocytosis after 30 months — that’s two and a half years after the experimental product was administered and, the cause was confirmed via a repeat of those results via a 2nd trial — doubtless, to be sure the AE was not ‘coincidental’. Furthermore, in keeping with medical ethics and legalities of informed consent, the later test subjects will have been informed of the one-in-four chance they may develop lymphocytosis:
A Serious Adverse Event after Successful Gene Therapy for X-Linked Severe Combined Immunodeficiency
‘We recently reported (April 18 issue)1 the sustained correction of X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency disease by ex vivo, retrovirally mediated transfer of the γc gene into CD34+ cells in four of five patients with the disease. These results have since been confirmed in four additional patients with typical X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency. Of the first four successfully treated patients, three continue to do well up to 3.6 years after gene therapy, whereas a serious adverse event occurred in the fourth patient. At a routine checkup 30 months after gene therapy, lymphocytosis consisting of a monoclonal population…
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM200301163480314
Minus the usual extensive clinical trials that would normally happen over course of several years during which, every AE would have been carefully monitored, the British public has been subject by the MHRA, to a slap-dash approach and with no credible information provided that could legally imply ‘informed-consent’ due precisely, to the fact the vaccine is still in its early human-trial stages and therefore, information is scant. How is it ethically possible that the MHRA could agree to authorising any such medical product to be administered to healthy people who by the overwhelming majority, are least at risk from severe symptoms of a new pathogen and, to include millions of children, even, unborn babies?
In such circumstances as described above, the alleged ‘law’ granting non-liability to the vaccine manufacturers, administrators and providers, is ethically ILLEGAL. It is a ‘law’ granting freedom to corporate entities to literally, play Russian Roulette with the public, who are offered absolutely no protection and only minimal compensation if indeed, the victims can spare 3+ years of court cases and convince a Judge that “Yes, it was the vaccine what did it your Honour”.
Returning to the Yellow-Card-Data-Base with the above points in mind, it is abundantly clear that the YCDB is presently, little more than a scam because no one is promptly following up on the reports which as stated previously, are being casually dismissed as unlikely to have been caused by the vaccine! When that assumption applies also, to previously healthy people who have collapsed and some dying, within 30 minutes of receiving the experimental product, the situation amounts to a criminal level of professional incompetence; considering the sheer numbers involved and the potential that many AEs could take 3–5 years to appear, the known risks do legally constitute a crime against humanity.
And in all such circumstances, Pfizer etc, now wish to administer BOOSTERS?
Crimes of Covid Vaccine Maker Pfizer Documented
https://www.dmlawfirm.com/crimes-of-covid-vaccine-maker-pfizer-well-documented/
British Medical Journal: Time to assume that health research is fraudulent until proven otherwise?
Roberts has conducted systematic reviews only to realise that most of the trials included either were zombie trials that were fatally flawed or were untrustworthy. What, he asked, is the scale of the problem?
Although retractions are increasing, only about 0.04% of biomedical studies have been retracted, suggesting the problem is small. But the anaesthetist John Carlisle analysed 526 trials submitted to Anaesthesia and found that 73 (14%) had false data, and 43 (8%) he categorised as zombie. When he was able to examine individual patient data in 153 studies, 67 (44%) had untrustworthy data and 40 (26%) were zombie trials. Many of the trials came from the same countries (Egypt, China, India, Iran, Japan, South Korea, and Turkey), and when John Ioannidis, a professor at Stanford University, examined individual patient data from trials submitted from those countries to Anaesthesia during a year he found that many were false: 100% (7/7) in Egypt; 75% (3/ 4) in Iran; 54% (7/13) in India; 46% (22/48) in China; 40% (2/5) in Turkey; 25% (5/20) in South Korea; and 18% (2/11) in Japan. Most of the trials were zombies. Ioannidis concluded that there are hundreds of thousands of zombie trials published from those countries alone.
FEBRUARY 25, 2020 Researchers Are Substantially Undercounting Gene-Editing Errors, Concludes a New Paper
In describing these findings the researchers called such oversights “serious pitfalls” of gene editing (Skryabin et al., 2020). In all, the new results suggest that gene-editing is more error-prone than thought and, further, that identifying and discarding defective and unwanted outcomes is not as easy as generally supposed.
Have Pfizer etc, provided any data from earlier trial stages to support the assumption that the new vaccines will not cause harm to recipients with natural immunity or, that the vaccine won’t destroy their natural immunity to Covid and other pathogens?
What happened to ‘pharmacovigilance’?
“We are Human Guinea Pigs”: Alarming Casualty Rates for mRNA Vaccines Warrant Urgent Action
Infertility & Birth Defects — UK Government release 25th report on Adverse Reactions to the Covid-19 Vaccines
The UK Government / MHRA have released the 25th update on adverse reactions to the Covid-19 vaccines which has seen more reports of birth defects, blindness, stroke, brain damage, paralysis, and death in the 7 days since the previous update.
UK Column: 41:46 — No Safety or Any Other Data But Booster Roll Out Anyway
https://www.ukcolumn.org/ukcolumn-news/uk-column-news-9th-august-2021
Haaretz Article: — https://bit.ly/3lPHf3Q
P&J Article: — https://bit.ly/3iv1B0a
mRNA, Nanolipid Particles and PEG: A Triad Never Used in Clinical Vaccines is Going to Be Tested on Hundreds of Millions of People
There are well-founded suspicions that these vaccines can insert themselves in our DNA, causing mutations whose impact is unknown and that could even be transmitted to our offspring. We explain how the mRNA existing in the cell cytosol can enter the nucleus both during cell division (mitosis and meiosis) and at rest (interphase). In addition, the possible routes of integration of DNA and RNA in our chromosomes through reverse transcriptase (RT) are discussed, especially in sperm where a specific endogenous RT has been identified.
https://biomedres.us/fulltexts/BJSTR.MS.ID.005501.php#
The Safety of COVID-19 Vaccinations — We Should Rethink the Policy
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/9/7/693/htm
8) Natural Immunity: All the evidence to date leaves us in no doubt that a majority of people have by now, developed natural immunity to C-19 and, that their immunity is long-lasting: ‘Conclusions Reinfection is rare. Natural infection appears to elicit strong protection against reinfection with an efficacy ∼95% for at least seven months.’
Seychelles: What is causing the post-vax rise in cases?
https://www.newsafrica.net/world/seychelles-what-is-causing-the-post-vax-rise-in-cases
74% of cases vaccinated CNN on CDC
https://twitter.com/GillianMcKeith/status/1423310928452460544
Natural infection vs vaccination: Which gives more protection?
Nearly 40% of new COVID patients were vaccinated — compared to just 1% who had been infected previously.
https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/309762
SARS-CoV-2 reinfection in a cohort of 43,000 antibody-positive individuals followed for up to 35 weeks
Conclusions Reinfection is rare. Natural infection appears to elicit strong protection against reinfection with an efficacy ∼95% for at least seven months.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.01.15.21249731v2
National Institute of health: Lasting immunity found after recovery from COVID-19
https://www.nih.gov/news-events/nih-research-matters/lasting-immunity-found-after-recovery-covid-19
COVID-19: Public immunity ‘significantly higher’ than tests suggest
Professor Hans-Gustaf Ljunggren: “Our results indicate that public immunity to COVID-19 is probably significantly higher than antibody tests have suggested. If this is the case, it is of course very good news from a public health perspective.”
https://www.sciencefocus.com/news/covid-19-public-immunity-significantly-higher-than-tests-suggest/
The links of evidence and associated concerns as shared herein represent a mere sample of evidence on which, this complaint is formulated and justified. Therefore, on behalf of millions among my fellow UK citizens who are equally aware of the evidence and who share my concerns, I request that the administration of the current experimental vaccines is suspended immediately and, that all of the AEs as now listed on the Yellow-Card Data-Base, are thoroughly investigated. Certainly, any notion of ‘boosters’ needs to be promptly shelved along with proposals to vaccinate children.
I also request that all pregnant women who have to date, participated in the trials, are now closely monitored and any possible impacts on feotal and child development are recorded both medically & legally, and that all recipients of the emergency-authorised vaccines are monitored for a period of 5–10 years.
Furthermore, I urge the MHRA to advise UK Gov’t on issue of proposed Covid-vaccine passports, that minus a license, such passports are invalid being as there is no evidence to support the efficacy of the current vaccines: In light of evidence supporting the efficacy of natural immunity, the proposed passports are unlawfully discriminatory against the immune powers of the natural human being and bias in favour of alleged immunity provided by medical-profiteers.
To conclude, I leave the MHRA with Dr Michael Yeadon & Professor Sucharit Bhakdi, M.D. as expert and professional witnesses who have testified (alongside many other equally qualified professionals), in support of the validity of the concerns and evidence as are presented in this complaint:
Dr Michael Yeadon: A FINAL WARNING TO HUMANITY: https://rumble.com/vk894g-dr-michael-yeadon-a-final-warning-to-humanity.html
Perspectives on the Pandemic | “Blood Clots and Beyond”: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pyPjAfNNA-U
Yours Sincerely,
Miss Deborah Mahmoudieh
Comments
Post a Comment